ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Prediction of marginal adaptation failure in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions, based on machine learning.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-Term Clinical Performance of Posterior Composite Restorations After Nearly Three Decades: A Clinical Follow-Up Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marginal adaptation failure in noncarious cervical restorations (NCCRS) significantly compromises restoration longevity and adversely impacts patient outcomes. early identification of high-risk restorations is therefore of clinical importance. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a supervised machine learning (ML) model capable of predicting the risk of marginal adaptation failure in NCCRS within 18 months following treatment. A total of 262 restorations were analyzed, incorporating multiple clinical variables, including adhesive system used, cavity geometry, degree of dentin sclerosis, incisogingival height, tooth characteristics, and patient age. Seven supervised ml algorithms were trained and assessed: decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, and random forest. model performance was evaluated using fivefold cross-validation and standard metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 score. Key predictive features identified were incisogingival height, patient age, and type of adhesive system. the auc values ranged from 0.72 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.57-0.88) to 0.52 (95%CI: 0.51-0.83), and recall values ranged from 0.77 (95%CI: 0.66-0.89) to 0.53 (95%CI: 0.40-0.66). Among the tested algorithms, SVM, gradient boosting, and KNN demonstrated superior predictive performance. these findings suggest that ml models can serve as effective tools for predicting restoration failure and may assist clinicians in optimizing post-treatment monitoring and follow-up strategies for patients with NCCRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.