Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41092138›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria2025

Variation in the hatching rate of larvae of four tick species from laboratory colonies.

Ygor Henrique da Silva, Marisa Beatriz da Silva Rocha, Ester Oliozi Marré, Manuela Pimentel da Motta, Brena Gava Guimarães, Thais Ribeiro Correia Azevedo, Guilherme Marcondes Klafke, Barbara Rauta de Avelar, Diefrey Ribeiro Campos, Fabio Barbour Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ygor Henrique da SilvaUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ, Instituto de Veterinária - IV, Departamento de Parasitologia - DPA, Seropédica, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-2528
Marisa Beatriz da Silva RochaUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ, Instituto de Veterinária - IV, Departamento de Parasitologia - DPA, Seropédica, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8738-3339
Ester Oliozi MarréUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ, Instituto de Veterinária - IV, Departamento de Parasitologia - DPA, Seropédica, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0398-9744
Manuela Pimentel da MottaUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ, Instituto de Veterinária - IV, Departamento de Parasitologia - DPA, Seropédica, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6167-9037
Brena Gava GuimarãesUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ, Instituto de Veterinária - IV, Departamento de Parasitologia - DPA, Seropédica, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3166-1605
Thais Ribeiro Correia AzevedoUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ, Instituto de Veterinária - IV, Departamento de Parasitologia - DPA, Seropédica, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3045-8787
Guilherme Marcondes KlafkeUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ, Instituto de Veterinária - IV, Departamento de Parasitologia - DPA, Seropédica, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5620-2483
Barbara Rauta de AvelarUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ, Instituto de Veterinária - IV, Departamento de Parasitologia - DPA, Seropédica, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7129-8287
Diefrey Ribeiro CamposUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ, Instituto de Veterinária - IV, Departamento de Parasitologia - DPA, Seropédica, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5434-1463
Fabio Barbour ScottUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ, Instituto de Veterinária - IV, Departamento de Parasitologia - DPA, Seropédica, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1683-8724

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the hatching percentage of tick larvae of Amblyomma sculptum, Dermacentor nitens, Rhipicephalus linnaei, and three strains of Rhipicephalus microplus. The egg masses laid by females of each tick species were weighed in different amounts (125, 250 and 500mg), placed in adapted 3 and 5 mL syringes, and incubated at 27°C and 80% relative humidity for 25 days for A. sculptum and 21 days for the remaining species. After this period, larval hatching rate was evaluated and data were analyzed through correlation and comparison between groups. The results showed that the average hatching rates varied from 27.9% to 42.2% for A. sculptum, 86.6% to 87.7% for D. nitens, 74.4% to 80.0% for R. linnaei, and R. microplus: 75.3% to 82.6% (UFRRJ strain), 64.6% to 72.2% (Mozo strain), and 71.8% to 75.2% (Porto Alegre strain). Although statistically significant differences were observed in the mean percentages between groups, the correlation was weak. We concluded that the weight of the egg masses and the volume of the containers did not significantly affect larval hatching.

Indexed as

RhipicephalusAnimalsFemaleLarva

Identifiers

PMID41092138
PMCPMC12643242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.