Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41092056›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025

Challenging the negativity bias in affective scene viewing: The role of social content.

Anna Fischer, Danilo Postin, Lina Johanna Meiners, Louisa Kulke, Pascal Vrtička, Anne Schacht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna FischerDepartment of Cognition, Emotion and Behavior, Institute of Psychology, Georg August University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0902-9286
Danilo PostinDepartment of Cognition, Emotion and Behavior, Institute of Psychology, Georg August University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Lina Johanna MeinersDepartment of Cognition, Emotion and Behavior, Institute of Psychology, Georg August University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Louisa KulkeDepartment of Cognition, Emotion and Behavior, Institute of Psychology, Georg August University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Pascal VrtičkaCentre for Brain Science, Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8920-5509
Anne SchachtDepartment of Cognition, Emotion and Behavior, Institute of Psychology, Georg August University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9471-3842

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 454648639-SFB 1528Leibniz ScienceCampus Primate Cognition W45/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How does the brain prioritize information when visual scenes contain multiple sources of relevance? While emotionally evocative content has long been considered central to attentional capture, social content constitutes another key dimension of relevance. However, the neural mechanisms underlying the integration of these relevance dimensions remain unclear. We co-registered event-related potentials (ERPs) and eye movements while participants viewed complex scenes varying in social content (social, non-social) and emotional valence (positive, negative, neutral). Early ERP responses (P1) showed enhanced amplitudes for positive social images, suggesting that social relevance can mitigate the early-stage negativity bias. Social content also modulated the EPN, while emotional valence shaped later components (P300, LPC), with larger amplitudes for negative scenes. Eye-tracking measures mirrored these ERP effects: initial saccades were faster for social images, and fixation patterns indicated increased visual exploration for both positive and negative social scenes relative to neutral ones. Together, these results support a sequential appraisal process in which social content is prioritized at early perceptual stages, while emotional valence influences later evaluative processing. This pattern challenges the notion of a general negativity bias and underscores the interactive and stage-specific contributions of social and emotional relevance in affective scene perception.

Indexed as

AffectBrainEmotionsEvoked PotentialsSocial PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdolescentAdultElectroencephalographyEye MovementsFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adultemotional valenceevent-related potentialseye trackingnegativity biassocial content

Identifiers

PMID41092056
PMCPMC12706866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.