ArticleDiabetes care2025
Clinical Characteristics in Swedish Children With and Without Autoantibodies at the Time of Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosis.
Article in Diabetes care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAutoantibodies have long been recognized as biomarkers of islet autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes, but their role in the pathogenesis is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to analyze clinical and hereditary characteristics of children presenting with and without autoantibodies at type 1 diabetes diagnosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsData were collected from children (<18 years) at the time of diabetes diagnosis as part of Sweden's national Better Diabetes Diagnosis study. Participants were categorized based on the presence or absence of autoantibodies. Variables compared were age at diagnosis, sex, HbA1c, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), parental heredity of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, level of C-peptide, BMI SD score (SDS), and HLA genotype. We used t tests, χ2 tests, and logistic regression for comparisons.
resultsOf the 2,753, children, 169 (6.1%) were autoantibody-negative at type 1 diabetes diagnosis. Of those, 66% were boys compared with 56% of children with autoantibodies (P = 0.009). Also, children without autoantibodies had higher HbA1c at diagnosis (11.3 vs. 10.8% [100 vs. 94 mmol/mol], P = 0.003), were less likely to present with DKA (9 vs. 15%, P = 0.039), and more likely to have parental history of type 2 diabetes (8 vs. 2%, P < 0.001) compared with children with autoantibodies. We did not observe differences for age at diagnosis, C-peptide levels, BMI-SDS, or HLA genotype between the children with and without autoantibodies.
conclusionsWe identified differences in clinical characteristics when comparing children with and without autoantibodies at type 1 diabetes diagnosis, highlighting potential heterogeneity in the disease's pathogenesis across subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.