Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41091924›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Benchmarking drug-drug interaction prediction methods: a perspective of distribution changes.

Zhenqian Shen, Mingyang Zhou, Yongqi Zhang, Quanming Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhenqian ShenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4921-7000
Mingyang ZhouDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Yongqi ZhangThrust of Data Science and Analytics, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangdong, 511453, China.
Quanming YaoDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8944-8618

Funding

Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project 2025A03J4491National Natural Science Foundation of China 92270106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationEmerging drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction is crucial for new drugs but is hindered by distribution changes between known and new drugs in real-world scenarios. Current evaluation often neglects these changes, relying on unrealistic i.i.d. split due to the absence of drug approval data.

resultsWe propose DDI-Ben, a benchmarking framework for emerging DDI prediction under distribution changes. DDI-Ben introduces a distribution change simulation framework that leverages distribution changes between drug sets as a surrogate for real-world distribution changes of DDIs, and is compatible with various drug split strategies. Through extensive benchmarking on 10 representative methods, we show that most existing approaches suffer substantial performance degradation under distribution changes. Our analysis further indicates that large language model (LLM)-based methods and the integration of drug-related textual information offer promising robustness against such degradation. To support future research, we release the benchmark datasets with simulated distribution changes. Overall, DDI-Ben highlights the importance of explicitly addressing distribution changes and provides a foundation for developing more resilient methods for emerging DDI prediction. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our code and data are available at https://github.com/LARS-research/DDI-Bench.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingComputational BiologyAlgorithmsComputer SimulationDrug InteractionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41091924
PMCPMC12579548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.