ArticlePloS one2025
A prospective single-masked, non-inferiority, parallel-group randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of a ChatGPT-based AI chatbot to improve Boston bowel preparation scores for colonoscopy preparation: A trial protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06905782 (Prospective Single Blinded Randomized Control Trial on the Effectiveness of Using Large Language Model Artificial Intelligence Chatbot to Improve Boston Bowel Preparation Score), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Single Blinded Randomized Control Trial on the Effectiveness of Using Large Language Model Artificial Intelligence Chatbot to Improve Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS) for Colonoscopy Preparation
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare through tools like large language model chatbots. AI chatbots can simulate human conversation, provide personalized information, and interact with patients in real time. Their ease of use and conversational interface make them attractive for healthcare education, especially in resource-limited settings. We propose a prospective, single-masked, randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether an AI-based chatbot (ChatGPT) is non-inferior to standard counseling in terms of patients' adherence to pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation instructions and thus enhance the Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS). Patients undergoing colonoscopy (ntotal = 96) will be randomized to ChatGPT 4.0 Large Language Model (LLM)-aided Colonoscopy Counseling (NChatGPT = 48) or standard counseling (nsc = 48) arms at a 1:1 ratio using a central block randomization scheme of varying block sizes. In the first group, participants will interact with ChatGPT 4.0 for bowel preparation counseling before colonoscopy, whilst the second group will receive standard counseling from trained clinicians. Only the outcome assessors will be masked to the intervention allotment. The primary endpoint is the BBPS, assessed for non-inferiority. Secondary endpoints are patient anxiety (DASS-21) and patient satisfaction assessed using DASS-21 and PSQ-18 questionnaires, respectively and the findings will be reported descriptively with two-sided 95% confidence interval and any p-values will be considered exploratory without multiplicity adjustment. The primary endpoint data will be analyzed using the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and non-inferiority framework based on the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control the confounders (age, gender (male as the risk factor), prior colonoscopy experience, colonoscopy indication, and baseline constipation score). The results will be compared with the findings based on the per-protocol (PP) analysis as part of the sensitivity analysis. The protocol adheres to SPIRIT 2025 and the SPIRIT-AI extension guidelines to ensure comprehensive reporting of this AI-based intervention. This trial has received ethics approval and the trial protocol has been registered with the clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT06905782).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.