Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41091743›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

How to jointly control a ball trajectory on a moving board: Methodological insights into Motor Learning and Rehabilitation.

Anaëlle Cheillan, David M Jacobs, Pedro Passos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anaëlle CheillanFaculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0411-1277
David M JacobsFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro PassosCIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor (re-)learning can be assessed using various conceptual and methodological frameworks, each of which portrays the learner's abilities in different ways. The present paper investigates how the direct learning theory can be applied to the assessment of perception-action couplings required for a highly-dimensional joint-action task. Eleven novice dyads were instructed to stand on an unstable surface (BOSU), while jointly manipulating a board with the aim to make a ball roll along a target. Ball and board's three-dimensional movements were recorded with an 8-camera motion capture system. Linear regression analyses were conducted to examine how task performance - using ball kinematics - and dyadic behaviour - using board kinematics - evolved with practice. Correlation analyses between movement and informational variables were used as a first step to build information spaces. Information spaces are a direct learning tool developed to investigate how the available information is exploited when practicing a new motor task. With practice, dyads reduced the variability in task-irrelevant degrees of freedom, while increasingly coupling the task-relevant degrees of freedom to more optimal informational variables. Finally, information spaces were discussed as a valuable tool for assessing and guiding the re-learning of perception-action in rehabilitation.

Indexed as

LearningMotor SkillsPsychomotor PerformanceAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMovementTask Performance and AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41091743
PMCPMC12527165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.