ArticlePloS one2025
Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes among different age groups in elderly patients with hip fracture surgery.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of soft tissue injury and their association with postoperative outcomes in intertrochanteric femoral fractures: A retrospective study.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Prognostic nutritional index at admission predicts 90-day mortality in patients aged ≥80 years with hip fracture: a system-level readout of the nutrition-immune milieu relevant to microenvironment-responsive bone repair.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- How Does Intra-operative Hypothermia Affect Peri-operative Outcomes in Hip Fracture Surgery?Strategies in trauma and limb reconstructionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies comparing the clinical characteristics and outcomes among different age groups in elderly patients with hip fractures are scarce. Thus, this study aimed to 1) analyze the clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes among different age groups in elderly patients undergoing fracture surgery. 2) provide more evidence-based basis for perioperative management.
methodsIn the retrospective study, 909 patients aged 65 years and above who underwent hip fracture surgery at Liaocheng People's Hospital between October 2020 and April 2023 were categorized into three groups based on age: young old group (YO group, 65-74 years old), middle old group (MO group, 75-84 years old), and oldest-old group (OO group, ≥ 85 years old). Then, their pre-fracture conditions, fracture causes and type, anesthesia and surgical details, postoperative complication and outcomes were compared.
resultsIn the YO, MO, and OO groups, the male-to-female ratios were 1:2.1, 1:1.8, and 1:2.3, respectively (P = 0.293). The proportion of patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) ≥ III, Nottingham hip fracture score (NHFS) ≥ 5 and preoperative activity tolerance < 4 metabolic equivalents (METs) increased sequentially (P < 0.001), across the YO, MO, and OO groups, whereas the proportion of those with three or more internal medicine comorbidities sequentially decreased (P < 0.001). All three groups were primarily injured by falls and the older the age, the higher the proportion of injuries caused by falls (P = 0.006). There was a higher proportion of femoral neck fractures in the YO group and a higher incidence of intertrochanteric fracture in the OO group (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients undergoing spinal anesthesia in the HO group (78.8%) was higher than that in the MO (59.9%) and YO groups (55.1%) (P < 0.001). Additionally, the proportion of postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (10%) was higher in the OO group compared to the MO (6.2%) and YO groups (4.5%) (P = 0.032). Meanwhile, the incidence of postoperative complications progressively increased in the YO, MO, and OO groups (P < 0.001). The mortality rates of the HO group at the hospital, 30 days postoperatively, and 90 days postoperatively were 6.3%, 9.6%, and 13.3%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the MO (2.7%, 3.6%, 6.2%) and the YO groups (1.2%, 1.8%, 2.4%) (P < 0.001).
conclusionsThe majority of elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery were female, with falls being the predominant cause of injury. Increasing age was correlated with poorer preoperative mobility, a lower prevalence of three or more comorbidities, and a higher likelihood of receiving spinal anesthesia. Lastly, the probability of ICU admission, complications, and mortality rate increased after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.