Trial reportPloS one2025
Impact of group antenatal care on lactational amenorrhea method awareness and knowledge: A cluster randomized control trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04033003 (Group Antenatal Care to Promote a Healthy Pregnancy and Optimize Maternal and Newborn Outcomes), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Group Antenatal Care to Promote a Healthy Pregnancy and Optimize Maternal and Newborn Outcomes: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High fertility rates in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), especially in sub-Saharan Africa and Ghana, lead to closely spaced pregnancies and contribute to high maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. Family planning remains critical for reducing rapid repeat and unwanted pregnancies, thus improving the health and survival outcomes. Unfortunately, many women face significant unmet needs due to limited knowledge, misinformation, and limited access to modern family planning methods in particular. Breastfeeding plays a substantial role, and the lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) offers a practical, natural, readily available, and cost-efficient postpartum option when practiced correctly. However, many mothers lack sufficient awareness of LAM and the conditions necessary for its effectiveness. Antenatal care provides a strategic opportunity for targeted education and counselling on contraceptive choices, empowering women with the knowledge to adopt safe, informed, and sustainable practices. Group antenatal care (G-ANC), recommended by WHO for research in LMICs, offers a comprehensive and participatory platform for health education and behavioral change. This study examined G-ANC and its impact on creating awareness and improving knowledge of the lactational amenorrhea method among mothers. A cluster randomized control trial, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 25/07/2019 with RCT number NCT04033003, was conducted in Ghana at 14 health facilities with a total of 1761 participants. The study included pregnant women who were at least 15 years old, able to speak English or one of four local languages, and less than 20 weeks of gestation at enrollment. Women classified as high-risk by the midwife were excluded from participation in the study. Facilities were randomized using a matched pair method. Structured interviews were conducted at baseline and subsequent timepoints. The results found that group antenatal care increases maternal awareness and knowledge of the postpartum lactational amenorrhea method of family planning compared to individualized care. Subgroup analysis revealed that a mother's level of education and parity strongly predict maternal awareness of the lactational amenorrhea method. These findings support group antenatal care as an effective strategy to improve knowledge on the use of lactational amenorrhea as a family planning method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.