ArticleAge and ageing2025
'I am old, and I will rather abandon life with my eyes open': a qualitative study of Norwegians aged 80 and older explaining their intensive care unit admission preferences.
Article in Age and ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Admission to intensive care: a matter of shared decision-making in the very old?European geriatric medicine · 2026Review
- Critical care of the very old, what needs to be done?European geriatric medicine · 2026Review
- Health-related quality of life and functional recovery one year after emergency abdominal surgery in patients over 75 years: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment preferences of patients aged 80 and older in the event of acute critical illness vary widely and are difficult to predict. To provide the appropriate level of care, it is necessary to better understand their personal treatment goals.
objectiveTo gain insight into the underlying reasoning for intensive care unit (ICU) admission preferences in hypothetical events of acute critical illness stated by Norwegian survey respondents aged 80 and over.
methodsA purposive sample of 202 Norwegian outpatients ≥80 years old who were considered potential ICU candidates provided 297 free-text comments to elaborate on their ICU admission choices in hypothetical scenarios of acute critical illness. Data were collected from November 2021 to March 2023 and analysed by Systematic Text Condensation, a method for thematic cross-case analysis. A theoretical framework for autonomy and trust in modern bioethics was utilized to focus the analysis. MAIN
findingsAll four main findings comprised descriptions of how the respondents sought to exercise autonomy. They explained their ICU admission preferences by (i) desiring to control the uncontrollable, (ii) prioritizing outcomes of importance to them, (iii) placing trust and (iv) accepting a larger context. We identified patterns ranging from the individual autonomy of varying degrees of action to the principled autonomy of obligation. Several justifications were relevant to different treatment choices.
conclusionDespite variable expressions through different justifications, our findings highlight the need for a greater understanding of older patients' requirements for autonomy and a strong patient-centred focus in ICU admission decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.