ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Mentorship-A critical metric for career development and advancing global health.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The burden of choice: decision regret in subspecialty selection among young and middle-aged doctors.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Evaluating a Tri-Institutional Cancer Research Capacity-Building Program for Early-Stage Investigators.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Mentorship as a Mechanism for Equity, Retention & Scientific Innovation in Neuroscience-related Careers.Oxford open neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mentorship plays a critical role in promoting career development and generating impactful research and programs, yet it is typically considered an altruistic endeavor and a luxury. Mentorship programs are largely unfunded and unsupported, particularly in the Global South. However, they are important in global health given the high need for mentors in many settings as well as the cross-cultural complexities and power dynamics inherent in the field. Mentor training programs are becoming increasingly available and have been shown to increase traditional metrics of impact-namely, manuscripts, grants, and program milestones. However, the current focus on these metrics without supporting mentorship can detract from their impact, leading to quantity over quality and programs disconnected from the communities they are meant to serve. In this article, we argue that making mentorship itself a metric will facilitate the true impact we seek in global health, while simultaneously promoting equity in opportunity. We describe mechanisms to ensure quality in mentorship and highlight the importance of governmental and non-governmental agencies and philanthropy in enabling institutions to implement mentorship programs. We further describe increasing access to mentorship at scale through digital platforms like The Village, which enables and supports mentor-mentee matches. Elevating mentorship to a core performance indicator will have profound downstream effects for the practice and products of global health.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.