ArticlePloS one2025
Informal care in different European care systems: Effects of caregiving on mental health over time.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe study explores the impact of informal caregiving on mental health within different European care systems, recognizing the significant role of informal care due to demographic changes and the shortage of formal care options. The growing necessity for informal care is opposed to labor market demands and geographic mobility. A distinction is made between the "family effect" and the "care effect" on mental health, emphasizing the need to explore these impacts across different care systems longitudinally.
methodsUtilizing data from the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) across six waves, this study includes respondents aged 30 and older who participated in at least three waves. Participating countries were classified according to support services - outpatient care, payments for nursing care, obligation to support relatives - into the care systems implicit familism, explicit familism and optional familism. We employ least squares dummy variable (LSDV) regression followed by two-stage least squares (TSLS) regression to investigate intra-individual changes and the relationship between informal caregiving and mental health.
resultsThe sample comprises 5,761 individuals, with 2,800 individuals involved in informal caregiving across three defined care systems. LSDV-results show that caregiving significantly affects mental health in explicit familism for both genders and in implicit familism for women, increasing depressive symptoms as measured by the EURO-D score. These findings are not confirmed by TSLS-results. Instead TSLS-results show positive significant influence of informal care on mental health for both genders in implicit familism which include a reduction of EURO-D score and no significant results in explicit familism.
conclusionThe study highlights the differential impacts of informal caregiving on mental health across European care systems. The policy frameworks in implicit familism appear to benefit informal caregivers. Future research should further explore the dynamics of care systems and the role of policy interventions in supporting caregivers' mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.