ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025
Machine Learning, Generalization, and Transfer Learning for Predicting the Exceedance of Fecal Indicator Bacteria Thresholds at Beaches.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wave-driven resuspension as the dominant environmental predictor of enterococci at Chicago beaches.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Beach water testing for fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) is a key element of public health protection for beachgoers. Because the process can be expensive and time-consuming, many beaches are infrequently monitored, putting the health of the public at risk. Machine learning (ML) models using large sets of FIB, weather, and other types of environmental data have been applied to predict FIB levels at beaches. If ML models developed using data from frequently monitored beaches in one location could be effectively applied to another location (referred to as "generalization"), public health protections could be easily extended to those infrequently monitored beaches. We found that source to target generalization augmented by transfer learning (TL) can predict FIB threshold exceedance with a specificity of 0.70 to 0.81 and sensitivity ranging from 0.28 to 0.76, depending on the beaches and TL methods. This degree of specificity and the high end of the sensitivity range are comparable to the performance of regression and ML models developed by using data from a given beach and applied to that same beach. With the addition of TL, we observed statistically significant improvements in model performance over source to target generalization, with increases of 28.3% in WF1 scores and 5.4% in AUC. Future research into optimizing the selection of data-rich source beaches for developing models that can be applied to a given target beach may further improve transfer learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.