Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41091542›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Analysis of Breast Cancer Information on Facebook Using Neural Network-Based Topic Modeling and Metadata Analysis of English and Spanish Content: Comparative Study.

Rasika Muralidharan, Arthur D Soto-Vasquez, María Montenegro, Danny Valdez

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rasika MuralidharanLuddy School of Informatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0362-4890
Arthur D Soto-VasquezHank Greenspun School of Journalism and Media Studies, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7240-2242
María MontenegroDepartment of Spanish and Portuguese, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, New Brunswick, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5210-2899
Danny ValdezSchool of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2355-9881

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosis among women, with approximately 2.3 million new cases annually. When faced with a cancer diagnosis, individuals often turn to the internet for information or reassurance, despite the risk of encountering low-quality or incorrect information. While this observation is well documented in English, limited work has been done to understand the quality of breast cancer information in Spanish, the second most commonly spoken language in the United States.

objectiveThis study uses natural language processing methods and quantitative modeling to analyze English and Spanish breast cancer posts from Facebook, a vital source of health-related information for 40% of English-speaking and 60% of Spanish-speaking adults in the United States.

methodsUsing the CrowdTangle application programming interface, we collected and processed 243,029 English-language and 96,334 Spanish-language Facebook posts. We applied BERTopic with the all-MiniLM-L6 model and k-means clustering to infer thematic structures and used coherence scores to determine the optimal number of topics for each language. Descriptive statistics compared metadata differences across languages. We calculated descriptive statistics and ran inferential tests for likes, comments, and shares. Finally, we examined the top 1% (n=2430 English and n=963 Spanish) of the most engaged content to analyze differences in poster characteristics across languages.

resultsCoherence scores indicated an optimal topic solution of k=40 (coherence=0.58) for English and k=30 (coherence=0.52) for Spanish. Thematically, we observed similar content in both languages, with topics spanning mammography, breast cancer events, pink ribbon month, and personal narratives. However, Spanish posts included local and municipal breast cancer events not present in English. Additionally, Spanish posts were more likely to mention at-home breast exams, which are no longer recommended in the United States. Engagement behavior showed statistically significant differences by language across likes, comments, and shares. English posts exhibited more consistent liking and sharing behavior, while Spanish posts showed more consistency in commenting. The top 1% (n=2430) of engaged content in English came from leading breast cancer nonprofits, whereas in Spanish (n=963, 1%), it originated from local governments or food and beverage companies.

conclusionsFacebook breast cancer content is generally consistent across languages. However, differences in engagement behavior suggest that English- and Spanish-speaking populations engage with content differently, highlighting cultural variability that warrants further exploration. Notably, leading cancer authorities may not have a strong presence in Spanish, indicating that the most accurate and up-to-date information may not be reaching a population particularly prone to worse breast cancer prognoses.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLanguageNeural Networks, ComputerSocial MediaFemaleHumansNatural Language ProcessingUnited Statesbreast cancercross-culturedigital healthLatinxsocial media

Identifiers

PMID41091542
PMCPMC12572747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.