ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025
Predicting the Impact of Drug Resistance Mutations on Inhibitor Potency with Molecular Dynamics and Machine Learning.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many enzymes are vital drug targets in diseases such as cancer and pathogenic infections; however, mutations can drastically disrupt inhibitor binding to confer resistance. Resistance mutations primarily occur at the inhibitor binding site, but accompanying distal mutations can exacerbate resistance to render even highly potent inhibitors obsolete. While structure-based analysis is often critical to drug design, the enzyme-inhibitor complex structures provide little insight as to why the mutated enzyme variant is resistant. In this study we are using a very potent inhibitor, darunavir, bound to a series of 28 variants of HIV-1 protease with affinities from picomolar to micromolar, to develop an accurate method for predicting resistance. Our optimized strategy involves rerefining cocrystal structures to ensure accurate inhibitor geometries and combining parallel molecular dynamics simulations with feature selection to develop a robust machine learning model to predict loss of potency and resistance. The best performing models included only physics-based features of intramolecular interactions, with four specific features largely distal from the active site sufficient to predict binding affinity within 1 kcal/mol of the experimental value, far better than models based on either the structures or sequences alone. Thus, we demonstrate a strategy to robustly predict the loss of binding potency due to unseen drug-resistance mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.