Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41091478›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2025

Mesh Weight in Reoperation for Recurrence After Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Can Deniz Deveci, Jason Joe Baker, Jacob Rosenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Can Deniz DeveciCenter for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Jason Joe BakerCenter for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Jacob RosenbergCenter for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Previous studies on mesh weights have focused on the definitions of lightweight and heavyweight meshes, which were not based on clinical outcomes. Objective: To investigate which mesh weight would be associated with the lowest reoperation rate for recurrence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide cohort study was based on prospectively collected data on eligible patients aged 18 years or older who had undergone a primary transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Denmark between January 1998 and July 2023 from the Danish Inguinal Hernia Database, obtained through population-based sampling. The final grouping included patients who received a mesh with a weight of <45 g/m2, 45-65 g/m2, or >65 g/m2. The database linkage to the Danish National Patient Registry made it possible to follow-up patients until the date of data extraction, death, emigration, or reoperation. Sequential explorative analyses were conducted to compare all mesh weight intervals to find the weight interval that resulted in the lowest risk of reoperation for recurrence. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was reoperation for recurrence using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: A total of 43 986 inguinal hernias from 36 446 patients were included: 16 949 in the less than 45-g/m2 group, 16 531 in the 45- to 65-g/m2 group, and 10 506 in the greater than 65-g/m2 group. A total of 1910 (4.34%) inguinal hernias underwent reoperation for recurrence. The mesh weight interval of 45 to 65 g/m2 had the lowest risk of reoperation for recurrence. Compared with a mesh weight of 45 to 65 g/m2, a mesh weight of less than 45 g/m2 had a hazard ratio for reoperation of 2.6 (95% CI, 2.2-2.8; P < .001), and a mesh weight of greater than 65 g/m2 had a hazard ratio of 2.4 (95% CI, 2.1-2.8; P < .001) for reoperation. Conclusions and Relevance: This nationwide cohort study found that a mesh weight of 45 to 60 g/m2 resulted in the lowest risk of reoperation for recurrence compared with other mesh weights in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. These findings suggest that selecting a mesh within 45 to 60 g/m2 can optimize outcomes and reduce the need for reoperation.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyLaparoscopyReoperationSurgical MeshAdultAgedDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID41091478
PMCPMC12529326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.