Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41091467›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Correctional Health and Oncologist Perspectives on Strategies to Improve Cancer Care in US Prisons: A Qualitative Study.

Christopher R Manz, Brett Nava-Coulter, Emma Voligny, Daniel A Gundersen, Alexi A Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher R ManzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brett Nava-CoulterDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Emma VolignyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel A GundersenRutgers Institute for Nicotine and Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Alexi A WrightDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Individuals diagnosed with cancer while incarcerated in US prisons have worse mortality than nonincarcerated individuals. Incarceration poses numerous barriers to care, and optimal strategies to improve cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment are needed. Objective: To investigate perspectives among correctional health and oncology clinicians on strategies to improve cancer care in US prisons, from screening and diagnosis to treatment and end-of-life care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study conducted interviews across 16 US state and federal prisons systems between September 2023 and April 2024 and a member-checking focus group in February 2025. Semistructured interviews were conducted with prison medical directors, primary care clinicians, and oncologists involved in delivering cancer care for individuals incarcerated in US prisons. Participants were recruited via email invitation sent to attendees of a correctional health conference, purposeful sampling using targeted emails to clinicians in diverse prison systems, and snowball sampling of individuals from research and participant networks. Interview transcripts were analyzed to identify all recommended strategies for improving care across the cancer care continuum. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to February 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: To identify recommendations on tools, practices, or policies to improve cancer care (hereafter, strategies) for incarcerated patients with cancer. Results: A total of 32 participants from 16 prison systems were interviewed (median [range] age, 49 [33 to ≥70] years; 20 female [62.5%]; 6 Asian or Pacific Islander [18.8%], 5 Black [15.6%], and 21 White [65.6%]), including 9 medical directors, 6 primary care physicians, and 15 oncologists. Participants identified strategies to improve care addressing nearly all previously identified barrier themes, including strategies for (1) conducting screening in prisons; (2) bringing cancer treatment into prisons and centralizing care; (3) using telehealth, navigators, and early oncologist involvement to improve care coordination; (4) improving communication and social support; (5) improving symptom management, access to palliative medicine, and end-of-life care; and (6) delivering patient-centered care. Strategies require implementation by prisons, prison clinicians, oncologists, oncology practices, and policymakers. A total of 22 focus group participants reinforced these strategies with additional supportive insights. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of clinicians delivering cancer care for incarcerated individuals, participants identified pragmatic strategies to improve cancer screening and treatment that address most identified barriers to care in US prisons. Application of these strategies may be associated with mitigation of disparities in cancer survival for incarcerated individuals.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelNeoplasmsOncologistsPrisonersPrisonsAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41091467
PMCPMC12529190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.