Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41091466›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Cancer Care in US Prisons.

Christopher R Manz, Brett Nava-Coulter, Emma Voligny, Daniel A Gundersen, Alexi A Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher R ManzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brett Nava-CoulterDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Emma VolignyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel A GundersenRutgers Institute for Nicotine and Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Alexi A WrightDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cancer is the leading cause of death in US prisons. Incarcerated patients with cancer have higher mortality than the general population, but little is known about barriers and facilitators to cancer care in prison. Objective: To describe barriers and facilitators to cancer care in US prisons from screening and diagnosis to end-of-life care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted among clinicians involved in delivering cancer care in US prisons, including prison medical directors, primary care practitioners (PCPs), and oncologists in 16 US state and federal prison systems between September 2023 and April 2024, and a member-checking focus group was conducted in February 2025. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to February 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were identification of key themes regarding barriers and facilitators to delivering cancer care to incarcerated patients across US prison systems. Interview transcripts were analyzed using mixed inductive and deductive thematic content analysis to identify emerging themes. Results: A total of 32 participants from 16 prison systems were interviewed, including 9 medical directors, 6 PCPs, and 15 oncologists, with a median (range) age of 49 (33 to ≥70) years. Participants predominantly self-identified as female (19 participants [59%]); 6 (18.8%) as Asian or Pacific Islander; 5 (15.6%) as Black, African, or African American; and 21 (65.6%) as White. Participants described 7 themes as barriers: (1) patients' acceptance of care; (2) population health and determinants of health; (3) care coordination between prisons and oncology practices; (4) communication between patients, oncologists, and prison clinicians; (5) symptom management; (6) transportation; and (7) humanity in care; as well as 3 cross-cutting themes of understaffing, prioritization of security over health, and nontransparent care within prisons. Participants described 2 themes regarding incarceration as a facilitator: increased access to health care for individuals with poor access in the community and help overcoming social determinant barriers. The 22-participant focus group affirmed these themes, added additional context, and identified no new themes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of clinicians involved in cancer care delivery for individuals incarcerated in US prisons, participants identified numerous barriers to cancer care delivery in prisons. These barriers represent opportunities for targeted interventions to improve cancer outcomes.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth Services AccessibilityNeoplasmsPrisonersPrisonsAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41091466
PMCPMC12529214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.