Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41091407›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026

Prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia lesions segmentation using diffusion kurtosis imaging, T2*, and R2* mapping with U-Net++ algorithm.

Hamide Nematollahi, Fariba Alikhani, Daryoush Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Masoud Moslehi, Amin Farzadniya, Pirooz Shamsinejadbabaki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hamide NematollahiDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0373-1795
Fariba AlikhaniDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4904-1420
Daryoush Shahbazi-GahroueiDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. shahbazi@med.mui.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8538-1898
Masoud MoslehiDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6230-6887
Amin FarzadniyaDepartment of Radiology, Askarieh Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9171-1283
Pirooz ShamsinejadbabakiDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4499-2796

Funding

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 3400544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to propose a deep learning-based segmentation framework to delineate prostate lesions across multiple MRI acquisitions and derived parametric maps, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI)-derived parameter maps (D map and K map), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and T2*-weighted imaging-derived parameter maps (T2* map and R2* map). Then, a comparison was conducted among the model's segmentation performance across MRI-derived images to identify those that provide the most discriminative information for accurate lesion identification. 51 patients underwent multiparametric MRI sequences, which included T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and T2*-weighted images. Three expert radiologists conducted manual lesion annotations. All images were preprocessed, labeled, and augmented before training the U-Net++ model. The segmentation model's performance was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient, Intersection over Union (IoU), sensitivity, and specificity metrics. The IoU values for the ADC map, D map, K map, T2WI, T2* map, and R2* map were 0.8907, 0.8559, 0.9504, 0.9250, 0.9441, and 0.8781, respectively. The corresponding Dice coefficient scores were 0.9416, 0.9211, 0.9744, 0.9604, 0.9709, and 0.9342. These results indicate a significant degree of overlap between the predicted and ground truth segmentation masks. These findings emphasize the complementary value of combining optimized deep learning architectures with advanced MRI-derived images, which could enhance diagnostic precision and facilitate more informed clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedProstatic HyperplasiaProstatic NeoplasmsAgedDeep LearningHumansMaleMiddle AgedBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)Deep learningDiffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI)Machine learningProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.