Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41091403›Full record

ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2025

Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on dentin hypersensitivity treatment using mouthwashes.

Lauro Taques Neto, Letícia Maira Wambier, Ana Cláudia Rodrigues Chibinski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lauro Taques NetoDepartment of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, General Carlos Cavalcanti Avenue, 4748, Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, 84030-900, Brazil. lauroneto15@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5686-9475
Letícia Maira WambierDepartment of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, General Carlos Cavalcanti Avenue, 4748, Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, 84030-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3175-2323
Ana Cláudia Rodrigues ChibinskiDepartment of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, General Carlos Cavalcanti Avenue, 4748, Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, 84030-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7072-9444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the publication of the CONSORT statement, numerous dental journals have recommended its use for the reporting of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). While numerous RCTs have been published assessing the efficacy of desensitizing mouthwashes for treating dentin hypersensitivity (DH), none of these studies have been evaluated for their quality using CONSORT guidelines. This study assessed RCTs investigating mouthwashes for DH treatment for adherence to CONSORT guidelines and their risk of bias. The databases of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, BBO, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from August to October 2024 for RCTs assessing the effectiveness of desensitizing mouthwashes. Adherence to CONSORT recommendations was evaluated using a specific tool, while the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2 was employed to assess the individual quality of the included papers. Out of the 2,883 papers retrieved, 36 were included in the qualitative analysis. The mean overall CONSORT score was 23.3 ± 1.4, out of a maximum of 32 points. Intervention, outcomes, hypothesis testing, and effect size were the most comprehensively described elements. Meanwhile, settings and protocol registration were only described by 12.5% of the articles. Significant differences in CONSORT scores were identified based on journal and publication dates. Low risk of bias was identified in 14 studies, two papers were judged to have an unclear risk, and no articles showed a high risk of bias. Full adherence to CONSORT recommendations was not attained in the analyzed papers, but most of the papers had a low risk of bias.

Indexed as

Dentin sensitivityMouthwashesRandomized controlled trialSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41091403
PMCPMC12528558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.