ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2025
Evaluation of the relationship between different types of skeletal malocclusions and nasal form: A cross-sectional study.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Considering the significant impact of the nasal form on the appearance of an individual, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between nasal morphology and skeletal malocclusion in a sample of Iranian population. In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 141 lateral cephalograms of individuals of both genders, aged 18 to 30 years were selected. The participants were classified into Class I, II, and III malocclusions. Then, naso-facial landmarks related to the form and shape of the nose and facial skeleton were manually traced on each lateral cephalogram and 13 angular and linear parameters were measured. These parameters were compared among the three types of malocclusions. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Chi-square tests. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Most of the measurements such as nasal morphology as well as nasal height, nasal bone length, nasal bone angle, nasofrontal angle, dorsum length, total nasal length, nasal depth, columellar convexity, and nasal hump did not show significant differences among different malocclusions (p > 0.05). However, lower dorsum convexity, soft tissue convexity, naso-facial angle, and naso-mental angle were reported to have significant differences among different malocclusions (p < 0.05). According to the results of the present study, the overall shape of the nose is not affected by the type of underlying skeleton in the sample studied. However, future studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to further confirm the results of the present study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.