ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025
Antifungal activity of cephalosporins as an alternative for the combat of Candida auris.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Candida auris is a multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen that presents significant challenges in healthcare settings due to its robust biofilm-forming ability. Conventional antifungal treatments frequently prove ineffective, emphasizing the urgent need for innovative disinfection strategies, including the potential repurposing of existing agents. To evaluate the in vitro and in vivo antifungal and antibiofilm activity of cephalexin, cefixime, and cefotaxime against C. auris. The efficacy of cephalosporins was tested using in vitro assays for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), biofilm inhibition, biofilm eradication, cell membrane integrity, nucleotide leakage, sorbitol protection assay, and efflux pump inhibition. An in vivo model using Tenebrio molitor larvae assessed survival rates and fungal burden after treatment. Cephalexin, cefixime, and cefotaxime exhibited MICs of 64 mg/L against C. auris. Cephalosporins significantly inhibited biofilm formation, with cephalexin completely eradicating mature biofilms within 45 min, demonstrating superior activity compared to chlorhexidine. Cephalexin, cefixime, and cefotaxime do not cause damage to the fungal cell wall or interfere with C. auris efflux pumps. Instead, their activity triggers the externalization of nucleotides without promoting protein leakage. In T. molitor larvae, both cephalexin and cefixime significantly improved survival rates and reduced fungal burden, further supporting their therapeutic potential in managing C. auris infections. These findings highlight the potential of cephalexin and cefixime for repurposing as effective agents against superficial infections. Their demonstrated antibiofilm activity, biofilm eradication capabilities, and ability to reduce fungal burden in vivo underscore their promise in mitigating C. auris infections and enhancing infection control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.