Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41091385›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025

Antifungal activity of cephalosporins as an alternative for the combat of Candida auris.

Milena Izabel Dos Santos Rodrigues, Fabíola Lucini, Gabrieli Argueiro da Silva, Mariana Carvalho Sturaro, Osmar Nascimento Silva, Thiago Mendonça de Aquino, Lavinia Leite Pintan Careaga, Alex Polatto Carvalho, Fabricio Fagundes Pereira, Simone Simionatto and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Milena Izabel Dos Santos Rodrigues *Laboratório de Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, Brazil.
Fabíola Lucini *Laboratório de Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, Brazil.
Gabrieli Argueiro da SilvaLaboratório de Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, Brazil.
Mariana Carvalho SturaroLaboratório de Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, Brazil.
Osmar Nascimento SilvaUniversidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Thiago Mendonça de AquinoLaboratório de Síntese e Pesquisa em Química Medicinal, Instituto de Química e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil.
Lavinia Leite Pintan CareagaLaboratório de Controle Biológico de Insetos, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, Brazil.
Alex Polatto CarvalhoLaboratório de Controle Biológico de Insetos, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, Brazil.
Fabricio Fagundes PereiraLaboratório de Controle Biológico de Insetos, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, Brazil.
Simone SimionattoLaboratório de Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, Brazil.
Luana RossatoLaboratório de Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, Brazil. luanarossato@ufgd.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6115-3313

Funding

Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul 115/2023, 83/024.181/2023 and 71/031.898/2022National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 420743/2023-5, 408778/2022-9, and 444735/2023-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida auris is a multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen that presents significant challenges in healthcare settings due to its robust biofilm-forming ability. Conventional antifungal treatments frequently prove ineffective, emphasizing the urgent need for innovative disinfection strategies, including the potential repurposing of existing agents. To evaluate the in vitro and in vivo antifungal and antibiofilm activity of cephalexin, cefixime, and cefotaxime against C. auris. The efficacy of cephalosporins was tested using in vitro assays for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), biofilm inhibition, biofilm eradication, cell membrane integrity, nucleotide leakage, sorbitol protection assay, and efflux pump inhibition. An in vivo model using Tenebrio molitor larvae assessed survival rates and fungal burden after treatment. Cephalexin, cefixime, and cefotaxime exhibited MICs of 64 mg/L against C. auris. Cephalosporins significantly inhibited biofilm formation, with cephalexin completely eradicating mature biofilms within 45 min, demonstrating superior activity compared to chlorhexidine. Cephalexin, cefixime, and cefotaxime do not cause damage to the fungal cell wall or interfere with C. auris efflux pumps. Instead, their activity triggers the externalization of nucleotides without promoting protein leakage. In T. molitor larvae, both cephalexin and cefixime significantly improved survival rates and reduced fungal burden, further supporting their therapeutic potential in managing C. auris infections. These findings highlight the potential of cephalexin and cefixime for repurposing as effective agents against superficial infections. Their demonstrated antibiofilm activity, biofilm eradication capabilities, and ability to reduce fungal burden in vivo underscore their promise in mitigating C. auris infections and enhancing infection control strategies.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandida aurisCandidiasisCephalosporinsAnimalsBiofilmsLarvaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTenebrioAntifungal AgentsCephalosporinsCefiximeCefotaximeCephalexinDisinfection

Identifiers

PMID41091385
PMCPMC12660517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.