ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2025
Combined mechanical ventilatory and mechanical circulatory support aids pulmonary vascular state in cardiogenic shock.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPercutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs) support patients in circulatory failure and increasingly concomitant respiratory failure. The presence of co-existent lung disease creates a management challenge due to cardiopulmonary interactions, especially when there is simultaneous mechanical ventilation and mechanical circulatory support. Enhanced understanding of the combined effects of these devices is necessary to better inform care for circulatory failure patients.
methodsA porcine model of titratable acute cardiogenic shock was used to quantify the effect of pVAD support on cardiac loading states in five intubated animals with positive pressure ventilation and varied intrathoracic pressure. Cardiovascular hemodynamics were assessed across positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ramps in animals in health, health with pVAD, and pVAD-supported cardiogenic shock induced via coronary microembolization.
resultsThis study employed invasive physiological metrics and assessment of right and left ventricular press-volume loops to recreate classic Frank-Starling curves. Increased intrathoracic pressure altered transmural pressure in the ventricles and the pulmonary vasculature and resulted in decreased venous return and stroke volume while increasing end-diastolic pressure consistent with decreased ventricular compliance. In pVAD-supported cardiogenic shock, elevated PEEP enhanced left ventricular output and increased pulmonary vascular compliance in several animals, contrary to traditional decrements observed with elevated PEEP. The right ventricular functional response aligned with these varied responses in pulmonary vascular state.
conclusionsThese results demonstrate that combined used of cardiopulmonary support devices in cardiogenic shock can create variable responses compared to classic physiological understanding. In pVAD-supported cardiogenic shock, an increase in ventilatory PEEP increased unloading from the heart and improved right ventricular function, counter to traditional findings. This demonstrates that combined use of these technologies could be leveraged to optimize a patient's volume status in complex shock and provides promise for management of patients with cardiopulmonary failure requiring simultaneous use of mechanical circulatory support and mechanical ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.