ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2025
Key factors in mandibular third molar surgery: a comprehensive view of their prevalence and interrelationships.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of OPG and CBCT in the Evaluation of Impacted Mandibular third Molar Proximity to the Mandibular Canal.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study comprehensively assessed the factors affecting the complexity of wisdom tooth surgery, the prevalence of each factor class, and the relationships between them. This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed 526 Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans of wisdom teeth. Variables examined included impaction positions using Winter's and Pell and Gregory's classifications, root counts, and frequency of contact with the inferior alveolar canal. The statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-square test. The vertical type was the most prevalent impaction position (n = 189, 35.9%), followed by the mesioangular type. According to Pell and Gregory's classification, the most frequent impactions were in positions A and 1. Of the cases studied, 234 involved mesial root contact, 239 had distal root contact, and 158 showed contact with both roots. In total, 345 cases (65.6%) exhibited contact between the third molar and the inferior alveolar nerve, most frequently in the apical third of the root (62.7%). The canal was most often positioned apical to the third molar (n = 415, 78.9%), and the highest ridge position was lingual (N = 234, 44.5%). These findings underscore the high prevalence of contact between impacted mandibular third molars and the inferior alveolar nerve, emphasizing the importance of meticulous preoperative planning to minimize the risk of nerve injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.