ArticleCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2025
Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Studies of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Scoping Literature Review.
Article in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewManagement of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors has improved patient survival. However, patient quality of life (QOL) continues to be impacted by disease symptoms and treatment-related adverse events. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide evidence of the patient experience. A scoping literature review was conducted to identify and summarize the evidence on PROMs used for patients with CML. RECENT
findingsEmbase and MEDLINE databases were searched for publications from 2001 to 2023 that reported PROMs. Ongoing and completed trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov were also reviewed. Results were summarized according to the PROMs used and the information collected in these PROMs. After screening 6337 records, 208 unique studies were identified with published PRO evidence reporting data from 92 unique PROMs. The most commonly reported PROMs (in ≥5% of publications) were used in 115 studies, of which 45 were exclusively in the frontline setting. The most commonly used PROMs in studies in the frontline setting were variations of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Measurement System/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, and 36-Item Short Form Survey. This scoping literature review highlighted that a variety of PROMs are used in CML studies, including studies in the frontline setting. Different QOL aspects are measured by commonly used PROMs, and the choice of PROM is dependent on the study setting and objectives. A more comprehensive understanding of QOL gained by using appropriate PROMs will help optimize patient-centered treatment selection in CML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.