ArticleProgress in orthodontics2025
A novel machine-learning-based model for prediction of open gingival embrasures between mandibular central incisors after clear aligners treatment: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting gingival embrasure risk after invisible orthodontics using multimodal data and machine learning.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a machine-learning-based model and construct a nomogram that integrates ClinCheck features and clinical risk factors for accurately predicting open gingival embrasures (OGE) between mandibular central incisors after clear aligner treatment (CAT).
methodsA total of 297 patients (163 normal and 134 with OGE) who underwent Invisalign
resultsSix clinical features, including age, gingival papilla angle, interproximal reduction, crown morphology and two types of tooth movement, were selected through LASSO regression. The combined model that consisted of OGE-area and clinical features demonstrated superior predictive capacity (AUC: 0.880; 95% CI: 0.840-0.916), outperforming both clinical model (AUC: 0.815; 95% CI: 0.767-0.861; P < 0.001) and ClinCheck model (AUC: 0.860; 95% CI: 0.817-0.900; P < 0.05). The corrected C-statistic of the combined nomogram was 0.888, and the calibration curve exhibited great performance with a mean absolute error of 0.012. In the DCA curve, the combined model showed higher net benefit than the clinical model when the threshold probability exceeded 0.13, and higher than the ClinCheck model between 0.13 and 0.63.
conclusionThe integration of clinical features and ClinCheck in the machine-learning-based model demonstrated favorable predictive capabilities for OGE between lower central incisors. This comprehensive nomogram may contribute to precisely prediction and prevention of OGE in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.