ReviewJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2025
Leaving the Bedside to Mend the Bedside: Influencing Public Policy.
Review in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Informed consent laws allow patients to decide what happens to their bodies within a medical setting, but medical practices within academic teaching hospitals do not always live up to ethical standards or align with the values and wishes of clinicians, patients, and families. Bioethics often helps to resolve these conflicts through collaboration and dialogue. However, when conflicts persist and are resistant to change, it may be necessary to pursue regulatory or legislative solutions. This paper discusses the role of bioethics in strengthening federal regulations on explicit consent for sensitive (pelvic, prostate, rectal, and breast) exams. Since psychologists within academic health centers may also wish to influence policy, this paper concludes with practical, achievable guidance for psychologists to gain an understanding of the public policymaking process, develop relationships with policymakers, and take steps to exert influence on the policymaking process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41091308What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.