Trial reportLasers in medical science2025
Efficacy and safety of 570/590 Nm yellow light combined with red light and infrared LED in treating facial skin photoaging: A Single-Center, randomized Controlled, exploratory study.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Photodynamic Therapy for Facial Rejuvenation Combined Amber LED and Infrared Laser Irradiation: A Pilot Study Comparing ALA and MAL.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compared the efficacy of 570 nm and 590 nm yellow light, combined with red light and infrared LED phototherapy, in treating facial skin photoaging. Thirty patients with skin photoaging were enrolled between December 2024 and January 2025 and randomly assigned to two groups: the 570 nm combined LED group (hereafter referred to as the 570 group) and the 590 nm combined LED group (hereafter referred to as the 590 group), with 15 patients in each. The 570 group received treatment using 570 nm yellow light, 620 nm red light, and 850 nm infrared light (power density: 7.1 mW/cm²; total energy: 6.39 J/cm²), while the 590 group was treated with 590 nm yellow light alongside the same red and infrared wavelengths and identical parameters. Treatments were administered three times weekly for 8 weeks. GSP scores and VISIA skin imaging analyzer assessments (pores, wrinkles, texture, brown spots) were recorded pre- and post-treatment. Twenty-eight subjects (93.3%) completed the study. After 8 weeks, the 570 group showed significant reductions in GSP scores, wrinkle scores, and brown spot scores compared to baseline (P < 0.05). The 590 group also demonstrated reductions in GSP and wrinkle scores (P < 0.05). The difference in wrinkle scores between the two groups post-treatment was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Both 570 nm and 590 nm yellow light, combined with red light and infrared LED therapy, effectively reduce pores, wrinkles, texture, and brown spots, improving skin photoaging. The 570 nm yellow composite LED treatment showed more significant effects on both facial wrinkles and brown spots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41091280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.