ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2025
Effect of nanoparticle incorporation on antimicrobial activity and shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesives: a scoping review.
Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual-functional Green Tea Polyphenol loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles for Eradication of Uropathogenic Biofilm and Induction of Apoptotic Pathways in Prostate Cancer Cells.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoparticle incorporation into orthodontic adhesives has emerged as a strategy to enhance antimicrobial properties, improve mechanical performance, and prevent enamel demineralization during fixed appliance therapy. This scoping review aimed to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of nanoparticle-modified orthodontic adhesives. A systematic search and independent screening process were conducted by two reviewers across multiple databases following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Among the 153 initially identified records, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (72%) were in vitro, whereas only 12% used in situ models. Preclinical studies are scarce (4%), emphasizing the gap between laboratory findings and clinical application. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), which demonstrate strong antimicrobial activity against S. mutans, E. coli, and S. aureus while maintaining acceptable bond strength at moderate concentrations, have been the most frequently investigated. Other nanoparticles, such as titanium dioxide (TiO₂), β-AgVO₃, mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles (MBNs), calcium phosphate compounds, and calcium phosphate compounds, also show promising antimicrobial and remineralization properties. However, variations in study designs, nanoparticle concentrations, and adhesive formulations hinder direct comparisons. Despite promising laboratory findings, the clinical application of nanoparticle-modified orthodontic adhesives remains uncertain due to the lack of standardized methodologies and long-term clinical validation. Further well-designed clinical trials are essential to confirm their efficacy, safety, and impact on orthodontic bonding performance under real-world conditions. Standardization of nanoparticle formulations and biocompatibility assessments are crucial to ensure their practical integration into orthodontic practice, promoting safer and more effective treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.