ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
Machine learning-driven prediction of organic solar cell performance: a data-centric approach to molecular design.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextOrganic solar cells (OSCs) offer a promising route toward flexible and sustainable energy technologies, yet predictive modeling of device parameters remains challenging due to the chemical diversity of donor-acceptor systems and morphology-dependent effects. In this work, we present the first systematic demonstration of using autoencoder-compressed molecular fingerprints with tree-based machine learning models to predict key OSC performance metrics-power conversion efficiency (PCE), open-circuit voltage (V
methodsThe dataset used in this work comprises approximately 2500 experimentally characterized donor-acceptor pairs from bulk heterojunction OSCs. These include both fullerene and non-fullerene acceptor systems. For each pair, the database provides electronic descriptors, polymerization-related metrics, and the SMILES representations of the donor and acceptor molecules. Molecular fingerprints were computed from SMILES codes using the RDKit and CDK cheminformatics toolkits. A variety of machine learning models were explored, including feedforward neural networks, autoencoders for feature compression, tree-based ensemble methods, and kernel-based regression algorithms. Hyperparameter tuning was carried out using the Optuna and BayesSearchCV libraries to ensure optimal model performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41091217What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.