SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025
Redefining Chiari Malformation Type III: a systematic review of prognostic stratification based on a three-tier MRI-based anatomical classification.
Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChiari Malformation Type III (CMIII) is a rare and severe hindbrain anomaly typically characterized by a low occipital or high cervical encephalocele containing brain tissue. Despite its traditional definition, considerable variability exists in the morphology and extent of the associated bony defect. With advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a more detailed understanding of CMIII anatomy is now possible. This systematic review aimed to categorize encephalocele patterns based on MRI findings in CMIII and assess their association with clinical outcomes.
methodsA systematic review of multiple databases was conducted to identify reported CMIII cases published between 1992 and 2022 with MRI-confirmed diagnoses and available outcome data. Inclusion criteria required detailed anatomical description, surgical management, and clinical follow-up. Anatomical classification was based on the extent of the osseous defect reported on MRI. Clinical outcomes included postnatal mortality (primary outcome), and neurological status, hydrocephalus, and need for cerebrospinal fluid diversion (secondary outcomes). Statistical analysis used Fisher's exact test.
resultsTwenty-five CMIII cases from 14 studies met inclusion criteria. Based on these cases, a classification into three types of CMIII was proposed: Type 1-isolated encephalocele in the occipital region; Type 2-encephalocele extending from the occiput (C0) to C2; and Type 3-encephalocele extending from C0 to the subaxial cervical spine. Mortality occurred in 20% of cases, being highest in Type 3 (37.5%) and absent in Type 1. Favorable neurological outcomes were most common in Type 1 (55.5%) and least in Type 3 (12.5%), showing a statistically significant association with defect type (p = 0.048). Hydrocephalus occurred in 72% of cases, most frequently in Type 3 (87.5%), though this was not statistically significant (p = 0.32). All surviving Type 3 cases required shunting.
conclusionRostrocaudal extension of the encephalocele defect in CMIII correlates with increasing mortality and worsening neurological outcomes. This MRI-based anatomical classification offers a practical framework for risk stratification, prognostication, and surgical decision-making in this rare and complex malformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41091210What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.