ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
Predictors of cognitive performance in idiopathic adult-onset dystonia.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sensory Tricks in Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Nested Quantitative Synthesis.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Pridinol treatment in cervical dystonia: improvement of non-motor symptoms.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- The spectrum of square wave jerks in essential tremor: an exploratory study.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive dysfunction is increasingly recognised as a potential non-motor feature of the idiopathic adult-onset dystonia (IAOD) phenotype. However, evidence from large cohort studies is lacking, as previous research has been limited to small samples, leaving several questions unanswered. To investigate whether cognitive performance in IAOD is related to or independent of clinical and demographic factors. A total of 297 patients with IAOD from the Italian Dystonia Registry, unselected with respect to cognitive status, were assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Dystonia severity was expressed using the Global Dystonia Severity Rating Scale (GDRS), while anxiety and depression were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Linear regression models were computed to explore the associations between MoCA scores and clinical and demographic variables. The mean raw total MoCA score was 22.8 ± 5.0, while the mean age- and education-adjusted MoCA score was 23.6 ± 4.0. Older age, fewer years of schooling, longer dystonia duration, segmental or multifocal dystonia distribution, higher HADS-depression score, and family history of dystonia were significant independent predictors of lower MoCA scores. No independent associations were found between MoCA score and sex, GDRS total score, presence of sensory trick, or HADS-anxiety score. In patients with focal dystonia, MoCA scores were not related to the specific site of dystonia. Our findings provide novel evidence supporting cognitive dysfunction as an intrinsic feature of the IAOD phenotype and suggest a possible pathophysiological link between dystonia and cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41091203What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.