ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Results from a US modified Delphi consensus to define disease progression and disease modification in polycythemia Vera.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Within 15 years of diagnosis, around 15% of polycythemia vera (PV) cases progress to post-PV myelofibrosis, and around 3% transform to acute myeloid leukemia within 10 years. Risk factors for disease progression include advanced age and the presence of certain acquired myeloid-relevant mutations. A better understanding of what defines disease progression in PV is essential when evaluating treatment options that enable disease modification and improved patient outcomes. A modified-Delphi method was used to convene a virtual steering group (SG) of seven US-based clinical physicians specializing in the management and treatment of PV. The group generated 41 consensus statements across six main domains. A survey was developed from these statements and shared with a broader panel of specialists, using a four-point Likert scale. The results were analyzed to determine the level of agreement for each statement. The consensus threshold was set at 75% agreement. A total of 61 responses were received from hematologist-oncologists (n = 56), oncologists (n = 3), and hematologists (n = 2). On analysis, 39/41 (95%) statements achieved consensus agreement, and 2/41 (5%) failed to achieve consensus. Consensus statements related to response assessment adjudication, treatment selection, and disease progression scored the highest, with 92% consensus among the wider panel. Based on the consensus, the SG agreed on a set of recommendations for defining disease progression and disease modification in PV. These recommendations aim to improve understanding of the disease course to support the development of more effective therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.