ArticleHuman genetics2025
The spectrum of pathogenic NF1 variants in participants enrolling on clinical trials of MEK inhibitors for plexiform neurofibroma.
Article in Human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) enrolled on interventional clinical trials of a mitogen activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitor for a plexiform neurofibroma (PN) are required to have inoperable, progressive and/or symptomatic tumor as per protocol inclusion criteria. Thus, the represented germline pathogenic NF1 variants of these clinical trial participants may correlate with increased risk for symptomatic and/or progressive PN. However, the spectrum of pathogenic NF1 variants of participants enrolled on interventional clinical trials has not been previously described. Herein, we report 39 individuals with a diagnosis of NF1 per the National Institutes of Health consensus criteria who received treatment with a MEK inhibitor through a clinical trial for a morbid and/or progressive PN. Truncating variants were the most common variant (N = 14; 36.8%), followed by frameshift (N = 10; 26.3%) and canonical splice/intronic (N = 7; 18.4%); only 1 participant had a NF1 microdeletion (2.5%). Three variants were noted to be recurrent in the study population (c.6789_6792del (p.Tyr2264Thrfs*5), c.4537 C > T (p.Arg1513*), and c.3826 C > T (p.Arg1276*)); there were no related study participants. There was no significant difference in rates of PN response to MEK inhibition across NF1 variant subtype (P = 0.616). In summary, the reported NF1 germline variants may represent those associated with an increased likelihood of symptomatic PN, however sample size limits inference regarding correlation. Contribution of this study’s findings to the literature may support future development of more accurate risk stratification for PN in individuals with NF1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.