ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Retrospective detection of missed intra-cranial aneurysms on computed tomography angiography using a commercial deep learning algorithm.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe early identification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) enables risk stratification and the timely initiation of optimal management. This study aimed to identify patients with missed aneurysms for follow-up and possible treatment, and to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercial deep learning algorithm in retrospectively detecting missed IAs on CTA.
methodsAll consecutive head CTA studies of adult patients performed at a single referral center between February 18, 2020, and July 31, 2022, were retrospectively collected. A machine learning algorithm using natural language processing (NLP) classified radiology reports as positive or negative for aneurysms, and a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm analyzed the imaging data. Concordant results with the original reports were accepted as ground truth, while discordant cases were reviewed by three neuroradiologists, with majority voting determining the reference standard.
resultsA total of 2,615 head CTA studies were analyzed. the algorithm flagged 34 suspected missed aneurysms, with 67% (23/34) confirmed as true positives by at least two neuroradiologists. This improved detection by 20.9% (23/110) or 0.88% of all studies. Most missed aneurysms were small (≤ 3 mm). There were 4 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 96.36%, specificity of 99.56%, positive predictive value of 90.6%, and negative predictive value of 99.84%.
conclusionThis study highlights the potential of deep learning systems to detect missed intracranial aneurysms. Although the missed aneurysms in this cohort were predominantly small, follow-up or diagnostic digital subtraction angiography may still be warranted, depending on clinical characteristics and risk factors for aneurysm rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41091156What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.