ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2026
Secondary spinal fracture risk among patients residing in medically vulnerable areas: A population-wide study.
Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study examined regional healthcare disparities' impact on the secondary fracture risk following spinal fractures, the likeliest secondary fracture types, and associated risk factors. MATERIALS AND
methodsParticipants were selected from the Korean National Health Insurance Service Sample Cohort. Secondary fractures were hip, wrist, humerus, spine, ankle, and pelvis fractures six months after the spinal fracture. The medically vulnerable regions were defined using the PARC index. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine differences in the secondary fracture.
resultsA total of 1,135 and 2,426 of the participants lived in medically severely-vulnerable and moderately-vulnerable regions, respectively. Among patients who had spinal fractures, those residing in severely-vulnerable areas had 1.16 times higher risk of secondary fractures compared to those residing in medically non-vulnerable areas. Within 25-84 months after spinal surgery, patients in severely-vulnerable regions had 1.28 times higher secondary fracture risk.
conclusionsAmong patients with spinal fractures, those residing in medically vulnerable areas have a higher secondary fracture risk than those living in non-vulnerable areas. Policy measures are crucial for preventing secondary fractures in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.