ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2025
Comparison of asprosin immunoreactivity in endometrial hyperplasia and grade-1 endometrial adenocarcinoma: A retrospective case-control study.
Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: It has been demonstrated that asprosin, a glucogenic adipokine released by white adipose tissue, contributes to the pathophysiology of cancer and disorders associated with it. The aim of this study was to compare the immunoreactivity of asprosin in grade I endometrial adenocarcinoma and in endometrial hyperplasia (EH) with and without atypia. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 cases previously diagnosed with grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma and EH with and without atypia, and for which paraffin blocks were obtained, were included in the study. The resulting paraffin blocks were sectioned again and immunostained for asprosin. A total of 80 cases were divided into 4 groups according to their histopathological diagnoses. Group (G) 1 (n=20): proliferative endometrium, G2 (n=20): EH without atypia, G3 (n=20): EH with atypia, G4 (n=20): Grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma. Endometrial samples from 80 patients were sectioned, and asprosin immunoreactivity was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining under a light microscope. Results: In comparison to the proliferative endometrium group, the grade I endometrial adenocarcinoma group had considerably increased asprosin immunoreactivity. However, between the proliferative endometrium group and the groups with endometrial hyperplasia, without atypia, and endometrial hyperplasia, with atypia, there was no significant difference in asprosin immunoreactivity. Conclusion: While asprosin immunoreactivity scores are higher in grade I endometrial adenocarcinomas, they are similar to those of the proliferative endometrium in cases of EH with and without atypia, suggesting that energy metabolism contributes to the development of cancer arising from endometrial hyperplasia. Asprosin immunoreactivity can be studied as a marker to predict the progression of EH to cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.