Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41091024›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2025

Comparison of asprosin immunoreactivity in endometrial hyperplasia and grade-1 endometrial adenocarcinoma: A retrospective case-control study.

Ahmet Şenocak, Şeyda Yavuzkır, Remzi Atılgan, Nurdan Yurt, Hilal Balta, Serhat Hançer, Tuncay Kuloğlu, Mustafa Yılmaz, Şehmus Pala, Bünyamin Çim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ahmet ŞenocakFırat University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elazığ, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0003-2808-5862
Şeyda YavuzkırFırat University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elazığ, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-7427-3891
Remzi AtılganFırat University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elazığ, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0003-2635-7158
Nurdan YurtMalatya Turgut Özal University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Malatya, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-4759-1624
Hilal BaltaFırat University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Elazığ, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0003-3745-9694
Serhat HançerFırat University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embriology, Elazığ, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0003-3237-3672
Tuncay KuloğluFırat University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embriology, Elazığ, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-9874-3838
Mustafa YılmazFırat University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Elazığ, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-4457-428X
Şehmus PalaFırat University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elazığ, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-2376-4244
Bünyamin ÇimFırat University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elazığ, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0003-2512-7705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: It has been demonstrated that asprosin, a glucogenic adipokine released by white adipose tissue, contributes to the pathophysiology of cancer and disorders associated with it. The aim of this study was to compare the immunoreactivity of asprosin in grade I endometrial adenocarcinoma and in endometrial hyperplasia (EH) with and without atypia. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 cases previously diagnosed with grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma and EH with and without atypia, and for which paraffin blocks were obtained, were included in the study. The resulting paraffin blocks were sectioned again and immunostained for asprosin. A total of 80 cases were divided into 4 groups according to their histopathological diagnoses. Group (G) 1 (n=20): proliferative endometrium, G2 (n=20): EH without atypia, G3 (n=20): EH with atypia, G4 (n=20): Grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma. Endometrial samples from 80 patients were sectioned, and asprosin immunoreactivity was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining under a light microscope. Results: In comparison to the proliferative endometrium group, the grade I endometrial adenocarcinoma group had considerably increased asprosin immunoreactivity. However, between the proliferative endometrium group and the groups with endometrial hyperplasia, without atypia, and endometrial hyperplasia, with atypia, there was no significant difference in asprosin immunoreactivity. Conclusion: While asprosin immunoreactivity scores are higher in grade I endometrial adenocarcinomas, they are similar to those of the proliferative endometrium in cases of EH with and without atypia, suggesting that energy metabolism contributes to the development of cancer arising from endometrial hyperplasia. Asprosin immunoreactivity can be studied as a marker to predict the progression of EH to cancer.

Indexed as

asprosinendometrial cancerendometrial hypeplasiaImmunohistochemistry

Identifiers

PMID41091024
PMCPMC12671459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.