Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41091017›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2025

Development and validation of a procedure to test perception of speech prosody in listeners with cochlear implants.

Harley J Wheeler, Matthew B Winn

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Weighting of Spectral and Temporal Cues with n-of-m Cochlear Implant Strategies Depends on Voice Pitch.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Harley J WheelerDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4199-7241
Matthew B WinnDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4237-7872

Funding

Listening effort in cochlear implant usersR01DC017114 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Matthew Brandon Winn · 2018 to 2026
$3.4M
Prosody perception in cochlear implant listenersF32DC021847 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WHEELER, HARLEY JAMES · 2024 to 2025
$158k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC021847NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding vocal prosody is essential to successful communication. However, evaluations of speech recognition have relied heavily on word repetition-type tasks where success does not hinge on prosody perception, or where stimuli do not have enough prosodic variation to even test for this ability. Individuals who use cochlear implants (CIs) are at risk for poorer perception of prosody because of their limited access to pitch perception. This study used a multi-slider visual analog interface to measure perception of contrastive focus prosody in sentence-length stimuli by participants with CIs or with typical hearing (TH). Compared to TH listeners, CI users were more likely to misidentify which word had prosodic focus, as well as having weaker perception of prosodic focus, on average. Whereas TH listeners scaled their perceived strength of prosodic focus based on F0 and vowel intensity features, CI users scaled ratings in accordance with vowel intensity and vowel duration, with no relationship to F0. These results suggest that CI users are at risk of complete misperception of a talker's intended message, even in instances where there was no uncertainty about the words that were spoken.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSpeech AcousticsSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPitch PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41091017
PMCPMC12571113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.