ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Driving Performance Under Peripheral Defocus Induced by Ophthalmic Lenses for Myopia Control.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Binocular Visual Function in Children Wearing Single-Vision or Highly Aspherical Lenslet Spectacle Lenses Assessed with a Tablet-Based Dichoptic Platform.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess whether peripheral defocus induced by myopia control spectacle lenses (MCSL) could affect driving performance, thereby posing a risk to driving safety. Methods: Twenty young adult participants (aged 18-25 years), all experienced drivers, were included in the study. Peripheral visual acuity (VA) and peripheral contrast sensitivity (CS) at 40 degrees eccentricity were assessed and compared for 2 conditions: baseline and wearing MCSL. Central dynamic VA and central coherent dot motion (CDM) detection were also assessed in the baseline condition. To study driving performance, participants completed a driving route in a simulator while performing visually demanding secondary tasks in both conditions (baseline and MCSL). The overall driving performance score (ODPS) was obtained. Results: MCSL significantly reduced peripheral VA at 40 degrees (Z = -1.990, P = 0.047) but had no statistically significant effect on peripheral CS (Z = -0.870, P = 0.384). Similarly, ODPS was not affected by MCSL (Z = -0.465, P = 0.642). Significant correlations were found between dynamic VA and ODPS, particularly during visually demanding secondary tasks (rho = 0.325, P = 0.010). CDM detection also showed significant correlations with ODPS both for the general route (rho = 0.737, P = 0.003), and when interacting with secondary visually demanding driving tasks (rho = 0.356, P = 0.004). Conclusions: Although MCSL negatively affected peripheral visual function, ODPS did not show significant changes. Further studies are needed to investigate their long-term effects on real-world driving performance. Translational Relevance: These findings suggest that MCSL may be a safe option for myopia control in terms of driving safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.