Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41090990›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2025

Harvest and natural predation shape selection for behavioural predictability in male wild turkeys.

Nick A Gulotta, Patrick H Wightman, Bret A Collier, Michael J Chamberlain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nick A GulottaWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6115-9862
Patrick H WightmanWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Bret A CollierSchool of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1867-0921
Michael J ChamberlainWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.

Funding

Agricultural Center, Louisiana State UniversityGeorgia Department Of Natural ResourcesNational Institute of food and agriculture 7001494National Wild Turkey FederationSouth Carolina Department of Natural ResourcesU.S. Forest ServiceWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has shown that traits increasing prey detectability, such as using open areas, higher activity levels and using areas frequented by hunters, reduce survival rates and are considered risk-taking behaviours. Despite extensive studies on how harvest-induced and natural selection impact average phenotypic expression, the influence of these factors on behaviour predictability remains unclear. Using a double hierarchical generalized linear modelling framework, we assessed variation in both average behavioural expression and predictability in male wild turkeys (n = 108) and explored how it related to susceptibility to harvest and predation. Our analysis revealed individual variation in predictability linked to risk-taking and activity (average speed-CVp = 0.28, 95% CrI = 0.23-0.33), with some males exhibiting more consistent behaviour than others. We also identified a behavioural type-predictability syndrome, where riskier individuals were more predictable, and more active individuals were less predictable (Average speed-r = 0.71, 95% CrI = 0.59-0.81). Additionally, individuals became more predictable and occurred closer to risky areas during the hunting season, coinciding with peak mortality for male wild turkeys. Our data suggest harvest-induced and natural selection on both behavioural types and behavioural predictability. Riskier behaviour types were more predictable in their behavioural expression and were more likely to be killed by both hunters and predators. We also found evidence that hunters selectively targeted individuals that were more active and unpredictable in their activity patterns, whereas predators preferentially targeted turkeys exhibiting less active, more predictable behaviours. Our findings suggest that adopting a cautious, sit-and-wait tactic may help male wild turkeys detect and avoid hunters, but may increase their vulnerability to predators that use a combination of visual and olfactory cues, along with area-restricted search behaviours, to locate prey. Our findings highlight the potential for harvest-induced selection to influence the behavioural composition of male wild turkeys, which has implications for management and conservation strategies.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalHuntingPredatory BehaviorSelection, GeneticTurkeysAnimalsMalebehavioural predictabilitybehavioural syndromebehavioural typeharvest‐induced selectionnatural selectionresidual intra‐individual variation

Identifiers

PMID41090990
PMCPMC12673237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.