ReviewInhalation toxicology
A review of popular vaping misconceptions: redefining ENDS safety and usage risks.
Review in Inhalation toxicology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between knowledge of electronic cigarettes and HTPs and intentions to use among university students: A cross-sectional study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- School administrator perspectives on electronic nicotine delivery systems use in Montana schools: A mixed-methods study.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among youth and adults has become a significant public health concern. Approximately 19.6% of middle and high school students in the United States have reported using ENDS containing nicotine. Factors contributing to their popularity include social and recreational appeal, sensory satisfaction, ease of accessibility, and aggressive marketing strategies including influencer-driven promotions and youth-targeted campaigns through social media platforms. The variety of available flavors and modifiable features of ENDS devices further enhances their acceptance, often overshadowing their potential health risks. Despite their perceived advantages, misconceptions about ENDS persist, including beliefs that emissions are harmless, vaping is safer than smoking, and secondhand exposure is inconsequential. These misunderstandings contribute to the normalization of ENDS use, hindering public awareness of the associated health and environmental hazards. This manuscript addresses seven prevalent misconceptions about ENDS ranging from their safety during pregnancy to their environmental impact, highlighting the need for comprehensive education and community engagement to mitigate the risks of ENDS usage and promote informed decision-making. In the following section of the Special Issue Science Education and Research on Vaping and Interventions for Community Engagement (SERVICE), we will explore how these misconceptions not only encourage the societal acceptance and use of ENDS but also contribute to potential health risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.