Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41090979›Full record

ReviewInhalation toxicology

A review of popular vaping misconceptions: redefining ENDS safety and usage risks.

Shaligram Sharma, Laura Crotty Alexander, Maureen Meister, Cassandra Ross, Joseph Hess, Kenneth Ray, Alexandra Noël, Jonathan Shannahan, Christa Wright

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Inhalation toxicology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shaligram SharmaChemical Insights Research Institute, UL Research Institutes, Marietta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9719-7572
Laura Crotty AlexanderSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Maureen MeisterChemical Insights Research Institute, UL Research Institutes, Marietta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9370-7042
Cassandra RossRedan High School, Atlanta Public Schools, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joseph HessChemical Insights Research Institute, UL Research Institutes, Marietta, GA, USA.
Kenneth RayThe Center for Black Health and Equity, Durham, NC, USA.
Alexandra NoëlComparative Biomedical Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Jonathan ShannahanSchool of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Christa WrightChemical Insights Research Institute, UL Research Institutes, Marietta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5950-9026

Funding

Early Periodontal Health Impacts of Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) UsageR56DE031814 · NIDCR · UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. · PI SHANNAHAN, JONATHAN HENRY, WRIGHT, CHRISTA YOUNG · 2022 to 2022
$624k
NIDCR NIH HHS R56 DE031814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among youth and adults has become a significant public health concern. Approximately 19.6% of middle and high school students in the United States have reported using ENDS containing nicotine. Factors contributing to their popularity include social and recreational appeal, sensory satisfaction, ease of accessibility, and aggressive marketing strategies including influencer-driven promotions and youth-targeted campaigns through social media platforms. The variety of available flavors and modifiable features of ENDS devices further enhances their acceptance, often overshadowing their potential health risks. Despite their perceived advantages, misconceptions about ENDS persist, including beliefs that emissions are harmless, vaping is safer than smoking, and secondhand exposure is inconsequential. These misunderstandings contribute to the normalization of ENDS use, hindering public awareness of the associated health and environmental hazards. This manuscript addresses seven prevalent misconceptions about ENDS ranging from their safety during pregnancy to their environmental impact, highlighting the need for comprehensive education and community engagement to mitigate the risks of ENDS usage and promote informed decision-making. In the following section of the Special Issue Science Education and Research on Vaping and Interventions for Community Engagement (SERVICE), we will explore how these misconceptions not only encourage the societal acceptance and use of ENDS but also contribute to potential health risks.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeVapingHumanse-cigarettesENDSmisconceptionsperceptionssafetyVaping

Identifiers

PMID41090979
PMCPMC12857793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.