Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41090872›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Interface Rotation in Accumulative Rolling Bonding (ARB) Cu/Nb Nanolaminates Under Constrained and Unconstrained Loading Conditions as Revealed by In Situ Micromechanical Testing.

Rahul Sahay, Ihor Radchenko, Pavithra Ananthasubramanian, Christian Harito, Fabien Briffod, Koki Yasuda, Takayuki Shiraiwa, Mark Jhon, Rachel Speaks, Derrick Speaks and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rahul SahayXtreme Mechanics Laboratory, Engineering Product Development (EPD), Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD), 8 Somapah Road, Singapore 487372, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0019-0153
Ihor RadchenkoXtreme Mechanics Laboratory, Engineering Product Development (EPD), Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD), 8 Somapah Road, Singapore 487372, Singapore.
Pavithra AnanthasubramanianNano-Micro Reliability Laboratory (MRL), Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD), Singapore 487372, Singapore.
Christian HaritoIndustrial Engineering Department, BINUS Graduate Program-Master of Industrial Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia.
Fabien BriffodResearch Center for Structural Materials, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba 305-0047, Ibaraki, Japan.
Koki YasudaDepartment of Materials Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Takayuki ShiraiwaDepartment of Materials Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Mark JhonInstitute of High Performance Computing (IHPC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 1 Fusionopolis Way, #16-16 Connexis, Singapore 138632, Singapore.
Rachel SpeaksDepartment of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering and Technology (MMET), Oregon Institute of Technology, Klamath Falls, OR 97601, USA.
Derrick SpeaksDepartment of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering and Technology (MMET), Oregon Institute of Technology, Klamath Falls, OR 97601, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3540-1720
Kangjae LeeOregon Renewable Energy Center (OREC), Oregon Institute of Technology, Klamath Falls, OR 97601, USA.
Manabu EnokiDepartment of Materials Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Nagarajan RaghavanNano-Micro Reliability Laboratory (MRL), Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD), Singapore 487372, Singapore.
Arief Suriadi BudimanIndustrial Engineering Department, BINUS Graduate Program-Master of Industrial Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia.

Funding

e-ASIA JRP (Joint Research Program) JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 23H04464 and JST SICORP Grant No. JPMJSC21E1Oregon Renewable Energy Center (OREC) Grant No. OREC2024/060/HPPT.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulative rolling bonding (ARB) Cu/Nb nanolaminates have been widely observed to exhibit unique and large numbers of interface-based plasticity mechanisms, and these have been associated with the many extraordinary properties of the material system, especially resistances in extreme engineering environments (mechanical/pressure, thermal, irradiation, etc.) and ability to self-heal defects (microstructural, as well as radiation-induced). Recently, anisotropy in the interface shearing mechanisms in the material system has been observed and much discussed. The Cu/Nb nanolaminates appear to shear on the interface planes to a much larger extent in the transverse direction (TD) than in the rolling direction (RD). Related to that, in this present study we observe interface rotation in Cu/Nb ARB nanolaminates under constrained and unconstrained loading conditions. Although the primary driving force for interface shearing was expected only in the RD, additional shearing in the TD was observed. This is significant as it represents an interface rotation, while there was no external rotational driving force. First, we observed interface rotation in in situ rectangular micropillar compression experiments, where the interface is simply sheared in one particular direction only, i.e., in the RD. This is rather unexpected as, in rectangular micropillar compression, there is no possibility of extra shearing or driving force in the perpendicular direction due to the loading conditions. This motivated us to subsequently perform in situ microbeam bending experiments (microbeam with a pre-made notch) to verify if similar interface rotation could also be observed in other loading modes. In the beam bending mode, the notch area was primarily under tensile stress in the direction of the beam longitudinal axis, with interfacial shear also in the same direction. Hence, we expect interface shearing only in that direction. We then found that interface rotation was also evident and repeatable under certain circumstances, such as under an offset loading. As this behaviour was consistently observed under two distinct loading modes, we propose that it is an intrinsic characteristic of Cu/Nb interfaces (or FCC/BCC interfaces with specific orientation relationships). This interface rotation represents another interface-based or interface-mediated plasticity mechanism at the nanoscale with important potential implications especially for design of metallic thin films with extreme stretchability and other emerging applications.

Indexed as

interface-based plasticity mechanismmultilayersnanolaminatesnanoplasticity

Identifiers

PMID41090872
PMCPMC12526440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.