Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41090840›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Machine Learning-Driven Design of Fluorescent Materials: Principles, Methodologies, and Future Directions.

Qihang Bian, Xiangfu Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qihang BianCollege of Electronic and Optical Engineering & College of Flexible Electronics (Future Technology), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China.
Xiangfu WangCollege of Electronic and Optical Engineering & College of Flexible Electronics (Future Technology), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-3357

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62575145Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China 23KJA510005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dual-mode fluorescent materials are vital in bioimaging, sensing, displays, and lighting, owing to their efficient emission of visible or near-infrared light. Traditional optimization methods, including empirical experiments and quantum chemical computations, suffer from high costs, high labor intensities, and difficulties capturing complex relationships among molecular structures, synthesis parameters, and key photophysical properties. In this review, fundamental principles, key methodologies, and representative applications of machine learning (ML) in predicting fluorescent material performance are systematically summarized. The core ML techniques covered include supervised regression, neural networks, and physics-informed hybrid frameworks. The representative fluorescent materials analyzed encompass aggregation-induced emission (AIE) luminogens, thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) emitters, quantum dots, carbon dots, perovskites, and inorganic phosphors. This review details the modeling approaches and typical workflows-such as data preprocessing, descriptor selection, and model validation-and highlights algorithmic optimization strategies such as data augmentation, physical constraints embedding, and transfer learning. Finally, prevailing challenges, including limited high-quality data availability, weak model interpretability, and insufficient model transferability, are discussed.

Indexed as

fluorescent materialsinverse designmachine learningphysics-informed learning

Identifiers

PMID41090840
PMCPMC12525727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.