Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41090823›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Strategic Design of Ethanol Oxidation Catalysts: From Active Metal Selection to Mechanistic Insights and Performance Engineering.

Di Liu, Qingqing Lv, Dahai Zheng, Chenhui Zhou, Shuchang Chen, Kaiyang Zhang, Suqin Han, Hui-Zi Huang, Yufeng Zhang, Liwei Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Di LiuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Life and Health Sciences, Huzhou College, Huzhou 313000, China.ORCID 0009-0002-7174-1570
Qingqing LvBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China.
Dahai ZhengSchool of Chemical Engineering & Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.
Chenhui ZhouDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Life and Health Sciences, Huzhou College, Huzhou 313000, China.
Shuchang ChenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Life and Health Sciences, Huzhou College, Huzhou 313000, China.
Kaiyang ZhangCollege of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Qilu Institute of Technology, Jinan 250200, China.
Suqin HanCollege of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Qilu Institute of Technology, Jinan 250200, China.
Hui-Zi HuangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7309-5539
Yufeng ZhangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Zero-Carbon Energy Development and System Integration, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China.ORCID 0009-0003-6305-2078
Liwei ChenCollege of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Qilu Institute of Technology, Jinan 250200, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1929-9351

Funding

General Research Projects of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department Y202454907Research Program of Qilu Institute of Technology QIT23TP011Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation ZR2024QB122the National Natural Science Foundation of China 22405229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) is a key process for direct ethanol fuel cells (DEFCs), offering a high-energy-density and carbon-neutral pathway for sustainable energy conversion. However, the practical implementation of DEFCs is significantly hindered by the EOR due to its sluggish kinetics, complex multi-electron transfer pathways, and severe catalyst poisoning by carbonaceous intermediates. This review provides a comprehensive and mechanistically grounded overview of recent advances in EOR electrocatalysts, with a particular emphasis on the structure-activity relationships of noble metals (Pt, Pd, Rh, Au) and non-noble metals. The effects of catalyst composition, surface structure, and electronic configuration on C-C bond cleavage efficiency, product selectivity (C1 vs. C2), and CO tolerance are critically evaluated. Special attention is given to the mechanistic distinctions among different metal systems, highlighting how these factors influence reaction pathways and catalytic behavior. Key performance-enhancing strategies-including alloying, nanostructuring, surface defect engineering, and support interactions-are systematically discussed, with mechanistic insights supported by in situ characterization and theoretical modeling. Finally, this review identifies major challenges and emerging opportunities, outlining rational design principles for next-generation EOR catalysts that integrate high activity, durability, and scalability for real-world DEFC applications.

Indexed as

anode catalystsdirect ethanol fuel cells (DEFCs)electrocatalysisethanol oxidation reaction (EOR)noble metals catalystsnon-noble metals catalysts

Identifiers

PMID41090823
PMCPMC12525641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.