Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41090720›Full record

ReviewCells2025

A Change of Hallmark: An Update.

Tom Donnem, David Kerr, Leonid L Nikitenko, Francesco Pezzella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tom DonnemDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, N-9038 Tromso, Norway.
David KerrNuffield Divisio Medical Labaratory Science, Radcliffe Department of Medicine John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7811-6722
Leonid L NikitenkoCentre for Biomedicine, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3801-729X
Francesco PezzellaNuffield Divisio Medical Labaratory Science, Radcliffe Department of Medicine John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review the latest development in non-angiogenic tumours. We focused on the last 3 years except the rarer tumours, for which the papers are older. Following the explanation of the modified hallmark of cancer, inducing angiogenesis and/or accessing vessels, the authors review primary and metastatic tumours growing into lung, liver and brain, plus oral cancer, lymphomas and node metastasis. Also progress in treatment, not many unfortunately, and techniques in non-angiogenic tumours are discussed.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNeovascularization, PathologicAnimalsHumansangiogenicco-optionmetastasesnon-angiogenicprimarytumours

Identifiers

PMID41090720
PMCPMC12524101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.