ArticleQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2026
Seeing Conflict: Identifying Self-Control Conflict Attenuates Early Allocation of Visual Attention to Positive Stimuli.
Article in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positive information such as temptations or stimuli related to reward attracts attention. This attentional bias is often considered to be habit-like and, consequently, to contribute to self-control problems. In contrast, we document across three studies how attention allocation to positive stimuli is attenuated when observers identify a conflict between positive information and a more important current goal. In study 1, students attended away from leisure-related temptations in the presence of studying reminders, however, they paid more attention to such positive, tempting stimuli when conflict was less salient such as when planning to engage in more leisure activities. Study 2 and 3 manipulated experimentally whether a conflict is identified and tested the effects of conflict identification on attention allocation. In study 2, students attended away from a positive temptation when they were prompted to consider it as detrimental to their studying goals but not when they reflected on how it might support their studying goals. This supports our assumption that activating a more important goal by itself does not cause attenuation of attention but the identification of a conflict with a goal. In study 3, reward-related information was attended to, but attention was attenuated when participants were instructed that the stimuli would temporarily harm and thus be in conflict with a more important goal. This effect was visible even without allowing participants to forget about the association with reward. In sum, malleable perceptions of conflict between positive information and important goals shape how observers orient to such information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.