Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41090556›Full record

ReviewHeadache2026

Migraine and patent foramen ovale: correlation, coexistence, dependence. A narrative review.

Olga Grodzka, Michał Borończyk, Anna Zduńska, Julia Węgrzynek-Gallina, Izabela Domitrz, Anetta Lasek-Bal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Headache, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olga GrodzkaDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Bielanski Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4398-675X
Michał BorończykDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Anna ZduńskaDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Bielanski Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Julia Węgrzynek-GallinaDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University Clinical Centre of Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Izabela DomitrzDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Bielanski Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Anetta Lasek-BalDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis review was conducted to analyze the current knowledge on the topic of the relation between migraine and patent foramen ovale (PFO) and indicate the most crucial clinical implications.

backgroundMigraine is a primary headache disorder that affects a significant part of the global population. Importantly, it has been considered a risk factor for ischemic stroke, especially in women with migraine with aura. The foramen ovale is a physiological opening in the atrial septum formed during fetal life, which closes in most people in the first year after birth. However, in some people, it can be present in adulthood and is called the patent foramen ovale. PFO is more likely to occur in patients with migraine compared to the population not experiencing migraine headaches.

methodsTwo review teams, comprising migraine experts and stroke experts, were engaged in the screening process, resulting in the inclusion of 204 relevant publications. To be considered for inclusion, an article had to directly cover the topic of PFO or migraine.

resultsIn the following work, we have focused on several aspects regarding the direct and indirect relationship between migraine and PFO. Although analyzing migraine pathogenesis, apart from the straight link between PFO and migraine, others are also considered, such as a prominent Eustachian valve or Chiari valve, causing a high-risk PFO or a paradoxical embolism. Regarding the clinical practice, the prevalence of PFO and migraine, indications for exact therapies, and subsequently, neuroimaging in the view of PFO and migraine, have been scrutinized. Another crucial aspect of this review is the risk of stroke in patients with migraine, considering the PFO presence. It is suggested that patients with migraine have more vascular lesions on magnetic resonance imaging and more often experience strokes. Thus, the question arises whether PFO should be closed as stroke prophylaxis in every migraine patient.

conclusionsSeveral aspects have been explored; however, more research is needed to draw clear conclusions with further indications for clinical practice. Nevertheless, it seems that not in all patients with migraine with PFO should the closure procedure be performed, but when the PFO is of a high-risk form or there are other indications, it should at least be considered. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY:

Indexed as

Foramen Ovale, PatentMigraine DisordersComorbidityHumansischemic strokemigrainepatent foramen ovaleprimary headache disordersright‐to‐left shunt

Identifiers

PMID41090556
PMCPMC12849539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.