ArticleJournal of integrative plant biology2026
Modulating the strigolactone pathway to optimize tomato shoot branching for vertical farming.
Article in Journal of integrative plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strigolactones in Plant Abiotic Stress Resilience: Hormonal Crosstalk, Mechanistic Regulation, and Agricultural Prospects.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Modulating the strigolactone pathway to optimize tomato shoot branching for vertical farming.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimizing plant architecture for specific cultivation methods is essential for enhancing fruit productivity. Unlike indeterminate growth plants, the total productivity of determinate growth plants relies on cumulative fruit production and synchronized fruit ripening from both main and axillary shoots. Here, we focused on SlD14 and SlMAX1, two key genes involved in the regulation of strigolactone (SL) signaling and biosynthesis, with the goal of maximizing yield and synchronizing fruit ripening by fine-tuning axillary shoot growth. Using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) technology, we found that the sld14, slmax1, and sld14 slmax1 mutant plants exhibited reduced plant height and increased axillary shoot proliferation compared to wild-type plants. However, these mutants showed reduced yield and delayed ripening, likely due to a source-sink imbalance caused by excessive axillary shoot development. A weak sld14 allele displayed a milder phenotype, maintaining total fruit yield and harvest index despite smaller individual fruit size. These findings indicate that allelic variation in SL-related genes can influence plant architecture and yield components. Our results suggest that weak or partial alleles may serve as promising targets for tailoring tomato architecture to space-limited cultivation systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.