ArticleInternational journal of fertility & sterility2025
Relation of Endometrioma and Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis Surgery on Ovarian Reserve: A Large Single-Centre, Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subtype matters: ovarian endometriosis impairs ovarian reserve and embryo quality-should these patients consider fertility preservation?Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Clinical challenges and therapeutic strategies in women with endometriosis, deep infiltrating endometriosis, and/or adenomyosis undergoing assisted reproductive technologies: a narrative review.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- Evidence on Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels and Endometriosis Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a lack of reliable data or evidence-based protocol for the management of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) lesions in reproductive age women. This study examines ovarian reserves in women who underwent endometriosis surgeries in an attempt to assist clinicians with decision-making for surgery and fertility preservation. Materials and Methods: This single-centre cross-sectional study included 508 women who underwent laparoscopic endometriosis surgery from June 2018 to December 2022. The women were divided into three groups: endometrioma (OMA; n=156), OMA+DIE (n=235), and DIE (n=117). Their anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels were compared to 50 healthy controls before surgery and at four and eight months post-surgery. Results: The DIE group had lower baseline AMH levels compared to the other groups (P<0.0001) following surgery, AMH levels decreased notably across all groups (P<0.001). Reductions in AMH levels after surgery were as follows: OMA group (49.84%), OMA+DIE group (62.20%), and the DIE group (43.46%). The most substantial decline was observed in the OMA+DIE group. There was no significant difference in AMH levels between four and eight months post-surgery. Conclusion: Although the OMA+DIE group experienced the greatest drop in ovarian reserve after surgery, DIE is as effective as OMA in reducing ovarian reserve pre- and post-surgery. Hence, overlooked DIE lesions during an ultrasound examination can greatly impact ovarian reserve in these women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.