ArticleJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology2026
Improving Diabetes Care Through Teamwork, Comprehensive Education, Tighter Goals, and Technology: Single-Center Data from Türkiye
Article in Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children aims to achieve an hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of <7%, a good quality of life and a life similar to that of their peers. While the HbA1c <7% target may be difficult to achieve, it is possible that national programs, quality control programs and setting team targets can achieve significant reductions in HbA1c. Methods: The records of children with T1D followed up in our department between 2020 and 2022 were analyzed. Children and their families received a comprehensive education including an “Individual Treatment Plan”, nutrition and carbohydrate counting. All HbA1c measured during follow-up were averaged for each child separately. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from the last visit was evaluated in terms of achieving CGM consensus targets. To assess the effect of CGM use and automated insulin delivery (AID) system use, subjects were divided into 3 groups as multiple dose insulin and CGM users, non-AID pump users and AID users and evaluated. Results: The 480 children included in the study had a mean HbA1c of 7.8±1.5% at the first visit. The median HbA1c value during the two-year follow-up was 7.1%. Of the participants, 43% had an HbA1c <7%. Evaluating cases by treatment modalities and glucose measurement methods revealed that AID users having the lowest mean HbA1c (7±0.7%). Conclusion: While diabetes technologies have significantly improved T1D treatment, we believe that holistic approaches focusing on patient behaviors, comprehensive education, teamwork, written individualized treatment plans, and tighter metabolic goals are effective in achieving better glycemic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.